State v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because the victim’s statements were not made under oath or at an earlier proceeding, they were not admissible as substantive evidence under OEC 801(4)(a)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. County of Clackamas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 22×
• Harris v. Morrow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-01-29· cited 7×
• State v. Swett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-06· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Middleton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
• State v. Moen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 189×
• State v. Isom
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 118×
• State v. Barkley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-19· cited 51×
• State v. Vosika
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-01-14· cited 35×
• State v. Arnold
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 28×
• State v. Vosika
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-04-22· cited 24×
• State v. Logan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-13· cited 16×
• State v. Gill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-09-10· cited 16×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Cornett
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 10×
• State v. Booth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 10×
• State v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-02-03· cited 8×
• State v. Verley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-04-24· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Cornett
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-01-27· cited 6×