State v. Vosika

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite the fact that the three-year-old victim was “too young to understand that the statements she was making could be related to her diagnosis or treatment!,]” the victim’s statements to a physician were themselves inherently reliable
• the court reasoned that, from the perspective of the foster mother, social worker, and pediatrician, the victim's statements regarding the identity of her abuser were essential to correctly treat the child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).