State v. Arnold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rule 220(c), SCACR, allows appellate court to affirm on any ground appearing in the record
• this appellate court upheld the validity of a search warrant despite a finding that the trial judge erred in considering information not set forth in the affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 52×
• State v. Dupree
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-30· cited 37×
• State v. Covert
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 15×
• State v. Driggers
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 15×
• State v. Bowie
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 15×
• Lapp v. South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-03-31· cited 8×
• Care and Treatment of Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-19· cited 7×
• State v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-28· cited 6×
• State v. Bellamy
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 2×
• State v. Hicks
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-02-25· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-12-02· cited 29×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 19×
• State v. Owen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-13· cited 16×
• State v. Adolphe
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-02-22· cited 12×