Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/11/1972
State v. Arnold
Citations
- 496 P.2d 919
- 9 Or. App. 451
- 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 1000
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding warning constitutionally defective because it did not advise the defendant of the right to counsel during questioning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Langtry, Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 34×
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-23· cited 33×
- M.A.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27· cited 19×
- State v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-04-22· cited 9×
- MAB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-27
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. GannOregon Supreme Court· 1969-12-19· cited 103×
- State v. AventOregon Supreme Court· 1956-10-27· cited 62×
- Criswell v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1968-07-15· cited 25×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-09-12· cited 14×
- State v. LowryOregon Supreme Court· 1967-02-01· cited 9×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-04-16· cited 3×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-07-09· cited 2×
- State v. WhitelockCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-05-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.