State v. Arnett
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4227
Syllabus
Appellant fails to show that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not filing a motion to compel, motion to suppress, or motion to dismiss based on unpreserved video evidence. Appellant has not shown that the potential video evidence was materially exculpatory or that it was destroyed in bad faith. Based on the record, it cannot be said that counsel acted unreasonably or that Appellant was prejudiced by counsel's failure to file the motions. Judgment affirmed. (Donovan, J., concurring in judgment only).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. KeithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-01· cited 485×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- State v. McClainOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. BeaversOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.