Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1/24/2008

State v. Armstrong

Citations

256 S.W.3d 243
2008 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the prosecutor’s statements during closing argument did not affect the outcome of the trial given the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt
stating that “typically when a prosecutor’s statement was not the subject of a contemporaneous objection, the issue is waived”
stating “typically when a prosecutor's statement was not the subject of a contemporaneous objection, the issue is waived.”
finding appellate remedy inadequate where integrity of venue statute would be compromised in an irreversible waste of resources
noting failure to contemporaneously object to prosecutor’s comments waives challenge
noting failure to contemporaneously object to prosecutor’s comments waives challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jerry L. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.