Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/7/2025

State v. Armstrong

Citations

2025 Ohio 771

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., appellant's convictions are supported by sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The state proved that appellant had constructive possession of drugs found in car and actual possession of gun, and detective's testimony did not contradict his report.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
State v. Hankerson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-05-19· cited 556×
State v. Richardson (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-29· cited 210×
State v. Teamer
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-08-05· cited 156×
State v. Devaughn
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-26· cited 18×
State v. Harris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-27· cited 6×
State v. Reed
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-02· cited 5×
State v. Brooks
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-11· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.