State v. Armijo
Citations
- 25 N.M. 666
- 1920 NMSC 011
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT .</p> <p>In this jurisdiction no corroboration of a prosecutrix for rape, by way of testimony of an independent character emanating from an outside source, is required in order to sustain a conviction. But the bald charge of a woman against a man in this regard, unsupported and uncorroborated by facts and circumstances pointing to the g-uilt of the accused, is insufficient to meet the requirement of the law that a verdict must be supported by substantial evidence.</p>
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ewing v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1942-12-01· cited 136×
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 47×
- State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-11-21· cited 24×
- State v. SeatonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-08-23· cited 19×
- State v. ShultsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-12-07· cited 17×
- State v. NuttallNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-06-11· cited 16×
- State v. CarrilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-12-11· cited 10×
- State v. BoydNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-08-18· cited 9×
- State v. ShouseNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-11-03· cited 7×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-04-10· cited 4×
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-03-23· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.