State v. Armengau

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 4299

Syllabus

Because the trial court lost jurisdiction to alter or amend the judgment of conviction and sentence after the judgment was affirmed on appeal, the trial court did not err when it denied appellant's combined motion for reconsideration of his first motion for leave to file a motion for new trial and, in the alternative, second motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial. The law of the case doctrine also presented a bar to the trial court's consideration of appellant's motion because the court of appeals had affirmed the denial of appellant's first motion for leave to file a motion for new trial on timeliness grounds. Judgment affirmed.