United States v. Valentin Carrasco-Tercero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “[t]heoretical applications of a statute to conduct that would not constitute a crime of violence do not demonstrate that the statutory offense is categorically not a crime of violence”
• applying Moncrieffe in holding that a defendant was required to demonstrate a realistic probability that New Mexico would charge an individual with aggravated assault on the basis of using insulting language while handling a deadly weapon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).