Skip to main content

State v. Aragon

Citations

  • 788 P.2d 932
  • 109 N.M. 632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentence could properly be amended to include a mandatory parole period
  • noting that the district court lacks 11 jurisdiction to amend a judgment and sentence during the pendency of an appeal and 12 does not regain jurisdiction until mandate has issued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Minzner, Alarid, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.