Supreme Court of North Carolina· 8/23/2024
State v. Applewhite
Syllabus
Defendant was properly indicted for multiple counts of human trafficking per victim. Further, although the trial court erred by failing to consider the substantial similarity of defendant's offenses pursuant to N.C.G.S. 15A-1340-14(e), the error did not prejudice defendant.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 1,300×
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,222×
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 987×
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-01· cited 913×
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 812×
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court· 2013-02-26· cited 758×
- Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1895-01-14· cited 490×
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 310×
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1953-10-14· cited 119×
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-21· cited 74×
- Fid. Bank v. N.C. Dep't of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2017-08-18· cited 27×
- King v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2020-07-10· cited 21×
- State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-06-06· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.