State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial because \the trial judge was in the best position to assess the degree to which the jury may have been prejudiced by the [witness's] outburst\
• \The decision whether to grant a mistrial because of a witness's outburst rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion or manifest prejudice to the complaining party.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-10-04· cited 39×
• Earley v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-10-19· cited 2×
• State v. John Ernest Perry, Jr.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-07-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Andrews
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-11-29· cited 95×
• Richmond v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-06-18· cited 39×
• State v. Barksdale
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-15· cited 27×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1974-03-11· cited 15×
• Rauch v. Zayas
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-07· cited 7×
• Corbin v. Prioleau
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-02-27· cited 3×