State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If [defendant] truly had believed that his pro se defense would be crippled without a continuance, he need not have dismissed his counsel who was fully prepared to try the case.”
• “If [defendant] truly had believed that his pro se defense would be crippled without a continuance, he need not have dismissed his counsel who was fully prepared to try the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-07· cited 26×
• State v. Barker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-18· cited 24×
• State v. Ralph Vernon G.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-01-27· cited 19×
• People v. Merritt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-10-26· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Maroney
  Supreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
• Bordenkircher v. Hayes
  Supreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
• Ungar v. Sarafite
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
• Chaffin v. Stynchcombe
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
• State v. Eller
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-07-11· cited 75×
• State v. Starrish
  Washington Supreme Court· 1975-12-11· cited 74×
• State v. Cadena
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-07-18· cited 40×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-02· cited 15×
• State v. Swindell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-02-13· cited 7×
• State Ex Rel. Nugent v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-11-08· cited 3×