Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 6 Idaho 706
  • 59 P. 180
  • 1899 Ida. LEXIS 52

Syllabus

<p>Rape — Uncorroborated Testimony of Prosecutrix. — While a conviction, for rape may be properly had upon the uncorroborated' testimony of a prosecutrix, this would only be warranted when ithe reputation of the prosecutrix for chastity is unimpeached, and when the facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense are corroboration and not contradictory of the statements of the prosecutrix.</p> <p>Same — Instructions—Prejudicial Error. — In a prosecution for rape, an instruction) which virtually instructs the jury that they may find corroboration of the testimony of the prosecutrix in her own statements is misleading and amounts to prejudicial error.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>

Judges: Huston, Quarles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.