State v. Anderson
Citations
- 6 Idaho 706
- 59 P. 180
- 1899 Ida. LEXIS 52
Syllabus
<p>Rape — Uncorroborated Testimony of Prosecutrix. — While a conviction, for rape may be properly had upon the uncorroborated' testimony of a prosecutrix, this would only be warranted when ithe reputation of the prosecutrix for chastity is unimpeached, and when the facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense are corroboration and not contradictory of the statements of the prosecutrix.</p> <p>Same — Instructions—Prejudicial Error. — In a prosecution for rape, an instruction) which virtually instructs the jury that they may find corroboration of the testimony of the prosecutrix in her own statements is misleading and amounts to prejudicial error.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.)</p>
Judges: Huston, Quarles
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-04-01· cited 62×
- State v. Todd James SurinerIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-01-23· cited 29×
- State v. RassmussenIdaho Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 18×
- State v. AndrusIdaho Supreme Court· 1916-04-05· cited 13×
- State v. FroelichIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-05-05· cited 11×
- State v. FarmerIdaho Supreme Court· 1921-10-22· cited 7×
- State v. Todd James SurinerIdaho Supreme Court· 2012-11-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.