Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/28/2020
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 6891
Syllabus
A joint sentencing recommendation is not binding on the trial court. Indefinite sentencing should be part of the explanation of the maximum penalty a defendant faces during the Crim.R. 11 colloquy.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. GriggsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-08· cited 395×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.