State v. Anderson
Citations
- 201 Conn. App. 21
Syllabus
Convicted of the crimes of assault in the first degree by means of the discharge of a firearm and assault of a peace officer by means of the discharge of a firearm in connection with his actions in shooting at two state marshals, the defendant appealed to this court. State marshals Q and V arrived at the defendant's residence to serve a capias warrant and take the defendant into custody for failing to appear at a court proceeding. Q and V went to the front door of the defendant's residence and were wearing clothing that identified them as state marshals and they displayed badges. V was in possession of the capias warrant and also was wearing a state marshal's hat. When the defendant came to the door, he provided the marshals with a false name. When the marshals confronted him with his photograph and told him that they would be taking him into custody, the defendant reached back and pulled out a gun. V yelled ''gun,'' and Q and V, who were unarmed, retreated, running in opposite directions. Q received gunshot wounds to his left foot and right forearm, while V was uninjured. Bridgeport police officers arrived on the scene and subdued the defendant. The defendant's brother, L, who was at the residence, testified at trial that Q and V were readily identifiable as state marshals and that he did not observe that the mar- shals were armed until one of them stepped into the doorway to grab the defendant. Q and V testified that they heard multiple gunshots as they sought cover. On appeal, the defendant claimed that the trial court improperly declined to instruct the jury on self-defense. Held that the trial court did not err in rejecting the defendant's request for a jury instruction on self-defense; there was insufficient evidence to raise a question in the mind of a rational juror as to whether the defendant shot at Q and V in self-defense, as Q and V were readily identifiable as state marshals and it was undisputed that, at the time of the shooting, the marshals were in f
Judges: Lavine; Bright; Beach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-17· cited 107×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-04· cited 93×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-10-31· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-02-02· cited 71×
- State v. NiewiadowskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-06-29· cited 30×
- State v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-04-18· cited 30×
- Kaddah v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-11-30· cited 24×
- State v. TerwilligerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-29· cited 18×
- State v. DeptulaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-27· cited 16×
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-29· cited 13×
- State v. DeptulaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-01· cited 12×
- Georges v. OB-GYN Servs., P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-03-29· cited 4×
- State v. DarrowConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.