State v. Anderson
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 190
- 104 N.E.3d 138
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant's suppression motion. A police officer possessed reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify briefly detaining the appellant to investigate a burglar alarm at a business where the officer observed the appellant acting suspiciously outside the business. The officer also was entitled to conduct a weapons frisk based on his reasonable belief that the appellant might be armed and dangerous. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.