Skip to main content

State v. Anderson

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 190
  • 104 N.E.3d 138

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant's suppression motion. A police officer possessed reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify briefly detaining the appellant to investigate a burglar alarm at a business where the officer observed the appellant acting suspiciously outside the business. The officer also was entitled to conduct a weapons frisk based on his reasonable belief that the appellant might be armed and dangerous. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.