Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/17/2008
State v. Anderson
Citations
- 180 P.3d 885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the first aggressor instruction is reviewed de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BeaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-07-12· cited 52×
- The State of Washington, Respondent, v. Dawn Marie Sullivan, AppellantCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-10-10· cited 31×
- State v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-12-16· cited 25×
- State of Washington v. Joseph Andrew RichmondCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-05-01· cited 15×
- State Of Washington v. Robin Leen DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-04
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,105×
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 352×
- State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court· 1999-05-13· cited 162×
- State v. LeFaberWashington Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 150×
- State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-07-27· cited 127×
- State v. RecuencoWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 93×
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-05· cited 30×
- State v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-09-11· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.