State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ‘“willingness to commit more than one criminal offense’ is, as with any other determination of culpable mental states, innately factual”
• pointing to the “substantially different” nature of two offenses, and to the lack of need to commit one to commit the other, as supporting the trial court’s finding that the defendant was willing to commit more than one offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Traylor
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-17· cited 14×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-07· cited 9×
• State v. Porter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-28· cited 9×
• State v. Agee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 8×
• State v. Opitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-15· cited 7×
• State v. Byam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-15· cited 7×
• State v. Sanchez-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 5×
• State v. Groves
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 3×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-03· cited 2×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-04