State v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that identification of a controlled substance can be established by lay experience based on familiarity through prior use, on-the-scene remarks by another identifying the substance as a drug, and use, such as peculiar ingestion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-19· cited 42×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz Harig
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-07-30· cited 132×
• State v. Wind
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 33×
• United States v. Lonnie C. Baggett, Jr.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1992-02-27· cited 21×
• State v. Bedker
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1989-02-16· cited 14×
• State v. Edelburg
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1986-02-18· cited 8×