State v. Anderson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1254
Syllabus
Petition for postconviction relief; untimely petition; R.C. 2953.21; R.C. 2953.23; Brady material; ripeness. Trial court did not err when it denied appellant's untimely petition for postconviction relief for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction where the petition failed to establish entitlement to consideration as required by R.C. 2953.23(A). Appellant's unsubstantiated and self-serving claim that he did not receive police reports was insufficient to establish that the State suppressed evidence, where the appellant argued in the alternative that he did not receive the police reports, or if he received them, he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to utilize them to impeach the State's witnesses. Appellant's argument challenging the State's res judicata argument is not ripe for review because the trial court summarily denied the petition and did not reach the merits.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,234×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. WalterOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-17· cited 5×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.