Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/27/2023
State v. Ameem
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1371
Syllabus
Law-of-the-case doctrine law of the case dicta obiter dictum. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err when it denied defendant's motion to dismiss because this court's prior statements regarding defendant's Megan's Law classification and registration duties were not law of the case they were dicta by which the trial court was not bound.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-03· cited 413×
- Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 229×
- Giancola v. Azem (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-03· cited 66×
- State v. McMullenOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-14· cited 10×
- Nelnet, Inc. v. RauchOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-14· cited 6×
- Grisafo v. HolllingsheadOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-19· cited 2×
- State v. AmeemOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-18· cited 1×
- Cleveland v. JaberOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.