Ohio Supreme Court· 2/17/1988

Hawley v. Ritley

Citations

35 Ohio St. 3d 157
519 N.E.2d 390
1988 Ohio LEXIS 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that an appellate court may rely upon App.R. 12(A) in disregarding an argument because the appellant failed to adequately brief the argument
determining that App.R. 12(A) permitted court of appeals to overrule or disregard an assignment of error not briefed
record did not show arrest of person or seizure of property necessary for malicious prosecution action
\[T]he decision of a reviewing court in a case remains the law of that case on the legal questions involved for all subsequent proceedings in the case at both the trial and reviewing levels\
the “plain language of the rule” permits overruling or disregarding an assignment of error for the lack of briefing
“the court of appeals acted well within its discretion in overruling or disregarding the sixth assignment of error because [of] the lack of briefing on this assigned error” [emphasis added]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Only, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.