Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/28/2001
State v. Alvarez
Citations
- 257 Conn. 782
- 778 A.2d 938
- 2001 Conn. LEXIS 343
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to review due process claim in interlocutory appeal from ruling denying motion to dismiss premised on double jeopardy claim
- declining to review due process claim raised in interlocutory appeal with double jeopardy claim
- Blockburger, which provides sole test for deciding whether two offenses constitute same offense for double jeopardy purposes, assesses whether each offense requires proof of fact that other does not
- Blockburger, which provides sole test for deciding whether two offenses constitute same offense for double jeopardy purposes, assesses whether each offense requires proof of fact that other does not
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-08-03· cited 62×
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 52×
- State v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-23· cited 43×
- State v. Rodney J. Miles a/k/a Jamal D. Allen (077035) (Camden County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2017-05-16· cited 36×
- State v. BurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-24· cited 27×
- State v. DensonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-29· cited 23×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-25· cited 20×
- State v. SchultzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-24· cited 20×
- State v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-04· cited 19×
- State v. Lamont FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-30· cited 19×
- Wentland v. American Equity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-02-17· cited 19×
- State v. PeayConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-07-11· cited 15×
- Neighborhood Builders, Inc. v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-02· cited 12×
- State v. BeaulieuConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-11-10· cited 12×
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
- State v. Bumgarner-RamosConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-02-05· cited 6×
- State v. WyattConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-12-30· cited 4×
- Davila v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-08-04· cited 2×
- State v. LutherConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-09-09
- State v. TerwilligerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-12-02
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-02-25· cited 1,334×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 875×
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 657×
- NielsenSupreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 642×
- Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 618×
- Schiro v. FarleySupreme Court· 1994-01-19· cited 550×
- Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 274×
- State v. ChicanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-25· cited 162×
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-08· cited 130×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.