State v. Alvarez
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1654
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B), ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, aggravated vehicular homicide, failure to stop after an accident, allied offenses, guilty plea, and motion to suppress. This court denied an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen because aggravated vehicular homicide and failure to stop after an accident are not allied offenses. Trial counsel was not ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress the fruits of a search, because it was not certain that the motion would have been successful and because trial counsel negotiated a favorable plea agreement. Appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to argue not pursuing the suppression motion, inter alia, because a guilty plea waives any error in pretrial suppression motions.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-29· cited 966×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. MullinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-18· cited 13×
- State v. SzidnikOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 11×
- State v. AlvarezOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-05· cited 5×
- State v. CollierOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-30· cited 3×
- State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-05· cited 1×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.