Skip to main content

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 192

Syllabus

CRIMINAL - The trial court's decision denying defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable and therefore the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion the trial court reasonably applied controlling case law to find a violation of R.C. 4511.33(A)(1) occurred where the defendant's vehicle crossed over the fog line by a half a tire width and therefore the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.