State v. Allen
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 947
Syllabus
The trial court did not err when it overruled appellant's motion to suppress. The Dayton Police Department's tow policy constitutes a reasonable standardized procedure, and there was no evidence in the record which established that the inventory search was a pretext for an investigative search. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance when his trial counsel allowed him to plead no contest to one count of having a weapon while under disability. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1985-05-15· cited 1,185×
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 1988-08-31· cited 695×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 551×
- State v. HathmanOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 102×
- State v. MesaOhio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 85×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 76×
- State v. PullenOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-27· cited 6×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-04· cited 4×
- State v. FavorsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-10· cited 3×
- State v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.