Skip to main content

State v. Allen

Citations

  • 865 S.W.2d 472
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183
  • 1993 WL 481872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court could not override the mandatory provision of §12.42(d) in favor of a discretionary sentencing provision available in §12.44(a)
  • analyzing mandatory life sentence provision found in a former version of Section 12.42(d), the habitual offender statute
  • section 5 12.42(d) applies when the State has proven the enhancement paragraphs and the factfinder has found the enhancement allegation to be true
  • section 5 12.42(d) applies when the State has proven the enhancement paragraphs and the factfinder has found the enhancement allegation to be true
  • ”Once the two prior felony convictions are found to be true, the mandatory operation of Section 12.42(d) restricts the discretion of the sentencing authority.”
  • “…this court determined that the language of Section 12.42(d) expresses the legislative intent that upon proof of certain criteria, the habitual offender statute dictates its mandatory operation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.