Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 153 S.W.3d 394
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6
  • 2005 WL 53429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that trial court could have properly used its plenary power to modify sentence if new sentence was within the same statutory range of punishment
  • concluding second sentence did not qualify as a nunc pro tunc
  • concluding second sentence did not qualify as a nunc pro tunc
  • concluding second sentence did not qualify as a nunc pro tunc
  • noting trial court could have properly used its plenary power to modify sentence if new sentence was within the same statutory punishment range
  • “[T]he trial court could use its plenary power to modify the sentence only as much as the new sentence would remain within the same statutory range of punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Keller, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price, -Filed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.