Skip to main content

State v. Alford

Citations

  • 395 So. 2d 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether the defendant knew of the presence of a controlled substance, in light of the State's traverse, was an ultimate fact question not subject to a motion to dismiss
  • whether the defendant knew of the presence of a controlled substance, in light of the State's traverse, was an ultimate fact question not subject to a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Letts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.