Skip to main content

State v. Alberts

Citations

  • 457 P.2d 991
  • 80 N.M. 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he evidence must be consistent with a legitimate purpose and have some proper probative effect upon an issue in the case.”
  • “The naming of defendants as persons engaged in ‘illegal marijuana traffic,’ for the purpose of showing why [an officer] conducted an investigation, is not a legitimate reason for admitting [hearsay] testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oman, Spiess, Hendley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.