Alaska Supreme Court· 6/23/1995

State v. Albert

Citations

899 P.2d 103
1995 Alas. LEXIS 73
1995 WL 372982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing the statute in Wicks and stating that \[t]he amount so taxed was docketed as a judgment\
discussing the statute in Wicks and stating that “[t]he amount so taxed was docketed as a judgment”
emphasizing the distinction between a system that merely “treats recoupment judgment debtors like other civil judgment debtors” and those that “give rise to contempt proceedings” or operate as a condition of probation
emphasizing the distinction between a system that merely \treats recoupment judgment debtors like other civil judgment debtors\ and those that \give rise to contempt proceedings\ or operate as a condition of probation
adopting the view that “no prior determination of a defendant’s ability to pay is required in systems where jail is a possible consequence of nonpayment, so long as there is an opportunity to establish inability to pay before the jail sanction is imposed.”
“Although the rule is silent as to the circumstances under which a hearing must be held when opposition is filed, our cases generally indicate the necessity for an evidentiary hearing in any case in which there are factual disputes on material issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Bryner, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.