State v. Aguilar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not prejudiced when the jurors saw him being searched where the jurors themselves had been frisked
• use of metal detectors and searches of people entering the courtroom not prejudicial, even where defense counsel not consulted regarding these measures, because the fact that everyone was searched minimized the risk that jurors would draw adverse inferences against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Jenkins
  California Supreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 769×
• State v. Richards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-31· cited 86×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-03-19· cited 44×
• State v. Cavegn
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-10-26· cited 18×
• State v. Valento
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-26· cited 10×
• Hellum v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Leavenworth
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-07-08· cited 9×
• State v. Zenanko
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-08-01· cited 7×
• State v. Ailport
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-09-15· cited 4×
• Garner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-15· cited 3×
• Randy Lee Hellum v. Warden, United States Penitentiary-Leavenworth Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, Attorney General, State of Minnesota
  Eighth Circuit· 1994-07-08
• People v. Jenkins
  California Supreme Court· 2000-05-04
• Ronta Garner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-15

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stewart
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-02-09· cited 33×
• State v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-04-13· cited 15×