State v. Adair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• saying the defendant’s failure to support his I.C.R. 35 motion with additional information as required for relief to be granted does not deprive appellate court of subject matter jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the denial of the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Armstrong
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-08-15· cited 32×
• State v. Fox
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-09-09· cited 13×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Huffman
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 1,151×
• Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1991-01-02· cited 492×
• State v. Moore
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-07-20· cited 156×
• State v. Hansen
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-05-01· cited 85×
• State v. Arambula
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-05-20· cited 76×
• State v. Jackson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1997-04-09· cited 35×
• State v. Shutz
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-07-28· cited 34×
• State v. Tipton
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-12-04· cited 26×
• State v. Moon
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2004-06-21· cited 3×
• State v. Shumway
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2007-07-18· cited 2×
• State v. Jones
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 1×