Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/13/1990

State v. Acosta

Citations

801 P.2d 489
166 Ariz. 254
73 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the search of a glove compartment was valid, while the search of the trunk was not valid
finding that crossing the dividing line constituted unsafe lane usage
finding defendant had out-of-state registration papers in someone else’s name, giving rise to a reasonable belief the vehicle was stolen
applying the inevitable discovery doctrine where “evidence would have been discovered inevitably or ultimately”
reasonable suspicion to believe car was stolen did not justify officer’s search into door panel
“The validity of consent is determined by considering, in light of all the circumstances, whether the consent was voluntary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich, Brooks, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.