State v. A. L. M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the discrepancy in the terminology and con- cluding that the difference does not affect the legal analysis
• “[W]e ask whether any reasonable juvenile court could have found itself unpersuaded, on this record, that youth had estab- lished by clear and convincing evidence that he was reha- bilitated and did not pose a public safety threat.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. A. R. H.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 5×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-14· cited 3×
• State v. W. V.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30· cited 2×
• State v. H. M.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-04· cited 1×
• State v. M. R. G.-E.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Civil
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-11· cited 127×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-07-24· cited 109×
• State v. J. D. S.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-04-27· cited 20×
• Dept. of Human Services v. T. J.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-03-04· cited 8×
• Patterson v. Foote
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-02-25· cited 5×
• Husk v. Adelman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-05· cited 4×
• State v. T. C.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-01-22· cited 1×