State Ex Rel. Tarney v. McCormack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he statutory provisions on substitution require that the request be filed before the judge has heard any contested matter”
• stating that the Bacon-Bahr series of cases establish a black letter rule barring the statutory right to substitute a judge in a proceeding to modify a divorce judgment
• allowing substitution requests after deciding motions to join and intervene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Holmes
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-02-02· cited 168×
• State Ex Rel. Cohen v. Riley
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-01· cited 19×
• State Ex Rel. Serocki v. Circuit Court for Clark County
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1991-06-25· cited 9×
• State v. Tavodess Matthews
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2021-05-14· cited 7×
• Antonio S. Davis v. Circuit Court for Dane County
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2024-03-26· cited 7×
• MacE v. GREEN LAKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1995-06-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carmichael v. Iowa State Highway Commission
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-06-26· cited 24×
• Clark v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 22×
• Bacon v. Bacon
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1874-01-15· cited 13×
• Oshkosh Student Ass'n v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1979-04-18· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. Akavickas v. County Court of Marathon County
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-04-22· cited 8×