Skip to main content
· 6/14/1980

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Thiessen

Citations

  • 612 P.2d 172
  • 228 Kan. 136
  • 1980 Kan. LEXIS 309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding statute enacted in bill that contained more than one subject in violation of Kan. Const. art. 2, § 16 was \invalid in its entirety\ and district court therefore erred in issuing writ of mandamus compelling compliance with statute
  • holding statute enacted in bill that contained more than one subject in violation of Kan. Const. art. 2, § 16 was “invalid in its entirety” and district court therefore erred in issuing writ of mandamus compelling compliance with statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.