Skip to main content

State ex rel. Stephan v. Parrish

Citations

  • 256 Kan. 746
  • 887 P.2d 127
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “instant bingo” exceeds constitutional boundaries for legal bingo games
  • court has authority and duty to define constitutional provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Holmes, Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.