State Ex Rel. Frizzell v. Highwood Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \ascertaining the meaning of constitutional provisions\ requires courts to consider the \understanding of the people at their adoption\
• \ascertaining the meaning of constitutional provisions\ requires courts to consider the \understanding of the people at their adoption\
• \[T]he constitutional ban against lotteries ... is not self-defining. That function is judicial in nature. \ (emphasis added)
• in ascertaining meaning of a constitutional provision, courts should give consideration to what appears to have been the intendment and understanding of the people at the time of its adoption
• giveaway radio show involves no consideration; game is not a lottery
• viewing a television program does not constitute \consideration\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).