State ex rel. Staes v. Gastinel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing a lifetime bar where the defendant played an essential role in a pump-and-dump scheme
• finding securities fraud scheme that was repeated four times and prepped for a fifth to be egregious
• issuing bar because of egregiousness despite defendant’s age and the low probability of filling an executive role after completing his sentence
• granting injunction “enjoining [defendant] from future violations of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5 and Section 17(a)”
• taking notice of the SEC’s “increasing the maximum Tier-III penalty from the statutory limit of $100,000 to account for inflation adjustments”
• imposing a lifetime bar where the defendant played an essential role in a pump-and-dump scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).