Skip to main content
· 4/15/1900

Poche v. New Orleans Home Investment Co.

Citations

  • 52 La. Ann. 1287

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. A vendor can not maintain a suit in reconvention without having first tendered the return of the price. He can not retain the price and claim the restoration of the property. A party demanding the rescission of a contract must return or offer to return the consideration received by him.</p> <p>2. Where the Board of Directors of a corporation, after full knowledge of the facts of the sale having been communicated to it, agreed to receive payment of interest on the note it held representing part of the purchase price, and extended the note, it ratified the sale as made. Thereafter it was estopped to seek avoidance of the sale because the President of the corporation, in the terms thereof, exceeded his authority. *</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The manner of arrest is immaterial to the validity of the indictment.”
  • “The manner of arrest is immaterial to the validity of the indictment.”
  • “There is no constitutional immunity from an unlawful arrest.”
  • “There is no constitutional immunity from an unlawful arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blanchard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.