State ex rel. Smith v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The rule is that the burden of showing inability to comply with an order of this nature is upon the respondent.\
• “The rule is that the burden of showing inability to comply with an order of this nature is upon the respondent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moreman v. Butcher
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 121×
• State v. Mecca Twin Theater & Film Exchange, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1973-03-22· cited 35×
• Villa v. Corte de Distrito de San Juan
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1933-12-11· cited 16×
• Stablein v. Stablein
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-01-18· cited 15×
• Britannia Holdings Ltd. v. Greer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-06· cited 15×
• Croft v. Croft
  Washington Supreme Court· 1914-01-29· cited 13×
• Armijo v. Armijo
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-06-07· cited 6×
• State v. McCoy
  Washington Supreme Court· 1922-10-30· cited 5×
• Villa v. District Court of San Juan
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1933-12-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1896-09-17· cited 8×