Skip to main content
· 9/22/1995

State Ex Rel. Schuetzle v. Vogel

Citations

  • 537 N.W.2d 358
  • 66 A.L.R. 5th 717
  • 1995 N.D. LEXIS 170
  • 1995 WL 560104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing person’s constitutionally protected liberty interest to refuse unwanted medical treatment and balancing liberty interest against relevant state penological interest
  • describing individual autonomy in medical decisions as a “fundamentally commanding” interest with “well-established legal and philosophical underpinnings”
  • recognizing liberty interest to refuse unwanted medical treatment
  • future medical cost of allowing diabetic prisoner to refuse treatment justified forced injections of insulin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meschke, Vande Walle, Levine, Neumann, Sandstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.