· 9/22/1995
State Ex Rel. Schuetzle v. Vogel
Citations
- 537 N.W.2d 358
- 66 A.L.R. 5th 717
- 1995 N.D. LEXIS 170
- 1995 WL 560104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing person’s constitutionally protected liberty interest to refuse unwanted medical treatment and balancing liberty interest against relevant state penological interest
- describing individual autonomy in medical decisions as a “fundamentally commanding” interest with “well-established legal and philosophical underpinnings”
- recognizing liberty interest to refuse unwanted medical treatment
- future medical cost of allowing diabetic prisoner to refuse treatment justified forced injections of insulin
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meschke, Vande Walle, Levine, Neumann, Sandstrom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.