New Mexico Court of Appeals· 4/10/1995
State Ex Rel. Martinez v. Kerr-McGee
Citations
- 898 P.2d 1256
- 120 N.M. 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that it would be \unfair to presume prior determination of an issue from the mere fact of settlement when the contrary may more likely be true\
- showing that claims are not precluded when a party could not seek a certain relief in the first action due to limitations on the subject matter jurisdiction of the first tribunal
- “Claims are not precluded ... where a plaintiff could not seek a certain relief or rely on a certain theory in the first action due to limitations on the subject matter jurisdiction of the first tribunal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bosson, Apodaca, Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pope v. Gap, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-06-18· cited 64×
- Elbert Strickland v. City of Albuquerque, and Arthur Blumenfeld, ph.d., Chief Administrative OfficerTenth Circuit· 1997-12-10· cited 30×
- Lewis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-01-27· cited 24×
- United Book Press, Inc. v. Maryland Composition Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-03· cited 20×
- Pielhau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-09-23· cited 19×
- Nichols v. DanleyD. New Mexico· 2003-05-12· cited 5×
- Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & Lawless, P.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-04-30· cited 4×
- Krietzburg v. Mucci (In re Mucci)D. New Mexico· 2013-01-22· cited 4×
- Hartnett v. Papa John's Pizza USA, Inc.D. New Mexico· 2011-10-07· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Scott C.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-09-03· cited 2×
- Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & LawlessNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-06-13· cited 1×
- Strickland v. City of AlbuquerqueTenth Circuit· 1997-12-11
- Pielhau v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-09-23
- Fogelson v. WallaceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2017-07-26
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1908-01-06· cited 431×
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-12· cited 186×
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 162×
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-04-16· cited 91×
- The Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. Homestake Mining Co.Eighth Circuit· 1984-01-20· cited 74×
- Effler v. RoseSupreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 57×
- Add Ventures, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-11-12· cited 57×
- United States v. DannSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 55×
- United States v. Arnold GemmillNinth Circuit· 1976-07-20· cited 54×
- State of New Mexico v. R. Lee Aamodt, United States of America, Intervenors AndTenth Circuit· 1976-08-11· cited 49×
- Ethan Allen Turshen, Trustee for James Louis Chapman v. James Louis ChapmanFourth Circuit· 1987-07-24· cited 47×
- United States v. Mary Dann Carrie Dann, United States of America v. Mary Dann Carrie DannNinth Circuit· 1989-04-27· cited 43×
- Temoak Band of Western Shoshone Indians v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1979-02-21· cited 37×
- Switzer Brothers, Inc. v. LocklinSeventh Circuit· 1961-11-30· cited 34×
- Edwards v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-02-12· cited 27×
- Department of Ecology v. Yakima Reservation Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court· 1993-04-22· cited 24×
- Connors v. Tanoma Mining Co.D.C. Circuit· 1992-01-28· cited 24×
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. CuomoN.D. New York· 1987-08-21· cited 17×
- Jerald H. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesFifth Circuit· 1987-08-21· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.