Skip to main content
· 7/26/2017

Fogelson v. Wallace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that courts “prohibit the use of evidence at trial that comes to light as a result of the exploitation of a previous illegal act of the police”
  • seizure when “at least two officers, and likely three, had surrounded” a suspect and asked for identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.