State Ex Rel. King v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that some commentators have suggested that textual divergence renders federal authority “not pertinent to a discussion of the requirements of a state constitution”
• observing that some commentators have suggested that textual divergence renders federal authority \not pertinent to a discussion of the requirements of a state constitution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).