Skip to main content

Ex parte State

Citations

  • 223 So. 3d 954
  • 2016 WL 3364689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Alabama's capital sentencing scheme, which utilizes a fact-finding jury, remains constitutional under Hurst
  • holding that the Supreme Court of the United States's decision in Hurst did not invalidate Alabama's capital-sentencing scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Joiner, Kellum, Welch, Wtndom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

79 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.