State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing rule of construction that “the Legislature is presumed to intend that every word used in a statute has a specific purpose and meaning”
• recognizing rule of construction that \the Legislature is presumed to intend that every word used in a statute has a specific purpose and meaning\
• recognizing the presumption that the Legislature intends “that every word used in a statute has a specific purpose and meaning.”
• observing “that the Legislature is presumed to intend that every word used in a statute has a specific purpose and meaning”
• rejecting construction of authority that renders other provisions “redundant, superfluous and without meaning[]”
• “It is a well known rule of statutory construction that the Legislature is presumed to intend that every word used in a statute has a specific purpose and meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).